Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2011, 5:07 am
These guidelines were challenged under Article 8 in the joined appeals R (S) v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police and R (Marper) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [2004] 1 WLR 2196. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
D. and A. v United Kingdom 32949/17 34614/17 The Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissenting) found justified discrimination in imposing the bedroom tax on a woman who, as a result of domestic violence, had had her home treated under the Sanctuary Scheme to include the modification of the attic to render it a “panic room”. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:26 pm
In other words, it appears that this dangerous “injunction” phenomenon is operating at a very low level – with an average of something like one a month. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
Lord Bingham in Shayler said it was important that there is a “bright line” in relation to security and intelligence disclosure; in other words, that everyone knew what the law was. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
The Court of Appeal decision The lead judgment, with which Lord Justices Phillips and Moylan agreed, was given by Lord Justice Males. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:06 am
Most residents in that area “are perceived to be nationalist” [12] (carefully chosen words from Lord Kerr) and as readers may have guessed, those taking part in the processions were loyalists. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
” [39] Lord Judge CJ then proceeded to discuss a number of Strasbourg authorities including in particular Atkinson, Crook and The Independent v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
The Court of Appeal consisting of Lady Justice Arden, Lord Justice Lloyd Jones and Lord Justice Kitchin (who gave the leading judgment) handed down its decision on this point last Wednesday in Comic Enterprises v Twentieth Century Fox Film [2016] EWCA Civ 455 . [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:55 am
Lord Phillips ruled that according to the wording of s 225 (1) (b) the judge had to assess the risk on the premise that the defendant was at large the moment the sentence was passed. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
But it can only do so if the new wording reflects, rather than runs contrary to, the spirit of the original law. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:00 pm
The case Friesen v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
”… … and yes, Siri did give definitions which accorded with our understanding of the word. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:50 am
However, Lord Walker departed from Lord Neuberger when it came to merely private information. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
As Gray J put it in Charman v Orion at [11] “The exercise is essentially one of ascertaining the broad impression made on the hypothetical reader by the [words complained of] taken as a whole. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
I was looking up the word "bear" on the theory that it connected to the word "embarrass," which comes up in older constitutional law cases about the power of Congress, including McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:27 pm
In the words of AK Sikri, J. who authored the judgement on behalf of the Division Bench also consisting of Ashok Bhushan, J. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm
At the hearing of the application for permission, Lord Justice Sedley ([2010] EWCA Civ 510) raised the question as to whether the words were defamatory at all and adjourned the application. [read post]
