Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 48,975
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2021, 8:56 pm
” SEC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 3:13 pm
Rodriguez et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 2:15 pm
The bench heard the plea of a 17-year old Delhi student, Aditya Dubey (Aditya Dubey v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am
As long as Apple is not considered a monopolist (and under the Epic v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 2:39 pm
" Elrod v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 6:48 am
Relying on the votes of five Justices in the Supreme Court's 2012 decision in the first Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Council of Teachers v Bo [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Council of Teachers v Bo [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am
Lastly, Little Hare Gin requested an award of costs off the scale. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm
Claim-specific settlement analysis indicates that the 3-year median and average settlement in Rule 10b-5 SCAs filed since 3Q of 2018, amount to $5.9 million and $15.8 million, respectively.[6] Based on these settlement estimates, the 3-year Rule 10b-5 SCA loss mitigation impact ranges between ~$260 to ~$700 million on the 44 (~8%) deficient (and active) Rule 10b-5 SCAs.[7] Notably, these estimates exclude defense and cost containment expenses, so the net loss mitigation… [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 10:19 am
Lashinsky v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:15 am
This saves on bandwidth costs, improves security, and decreases page load times. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:30 am
Apply similar maths to a start-up company that is the victim of a cyber-attack where the personal information of, say, 50,000 individuals is stolen and you get an even more unjust result: £750 x 50,000 = £37,500,000 (£37.5m) = end of company (even before costs are factored in). [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:30 pm
The UK Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated decision in the Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50 case on 10 November 2021 restricting claimants’ ability to bring data privacy class actions in the UK under the (now repealed) Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm
That is, one is looking at the Arizona rule independently of the question of how it fits with other states' rules.Bibb balancing - In Bibb v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:03 pm
See Plunkett v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 8:57 am
Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
MBIA Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
For example, when settlements are reached, often an uncontested motion and court decision is required to grant or dismiss the proceeding, or return security for costs that may have been paid into court. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 11:08 pm
In failing to instruct that the dogs be removed from the premises, the conduct of the minister was held to be unreasonable and negligent as such steps would not have involved much extra cost. [read post]
