Search for: "Line v. People" Results 5781 - 5800 of 13,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2016, 10:55 am by John Floyd
  The bottom line is this: the police cannot shoot and kill citizens based on perceived threats alone. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979), the Supreme Court developed a bright-line application of the reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test that is relevant here. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:56 pm by Schachtman
Tracing a Fault Line in Daubert,” 654 Wayne L. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:57 am by Ilya Somin
City of New London was in line with precedent, and within the “mainstream” of legal thought. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Don’t want a situation where people don’t even bother with design patents, given their increasing use in fashion where there hasn’t been protection in the past. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am by Eric Goldman
Three recent Section 230 rulings stand out to me as possible bases why the AGs might now think that they can now get around Section 230: 1) People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
At the press conference, Schneiderman said, “The bottom line is simple: Climate change is real; it is a threat to all the people we represent. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:26 am by Ron Coleman
Bentley and O-Line allege that their LB marks are recognized by people interested in football, sports performance, and fitness training. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
 https://law.lclark.edu/programs/business_law/fall_forum/It was my great pleasure to participate in a great conference hosted by the Lewis and Clark Law School, Innovating Corporate Social Responsibility: From the Local to the Global. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am by Charlie Dunlap
., 2012), I said that the “one institution of government in which the people retained faith was the military. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:56 am by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
A dispute over a limitation period in a LTD claim was the subject of the recent decision of Richards v. [read post]