Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 5781 - 5800 of 9,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Eric Segall
United States, in which the Could upheld the forced relocation of all people of Japanese descent on the West Coast just because of their ancestry. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
Nearly all of the interested parties support keeping the settlement in place but the United States government--in its capacity as what Deputy SG Curtis Gannon called its "watchdog" role--objected that the bankruptcy court lacks authority to release third parties like the Sacklers (who did not file for personal bankruptcy) from liability. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:35 am by Mark Walsh
Chief Justice Roberts announces the Court’s per curiam decision in Zubik v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Mark Walsh
United States on behalf of Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Justice Department. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm by Lara Fowler
Edwin Kneedler, deputy solicitor general, argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Section 3 says the following:No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am by Curtis Bradley
And the Court distances itself from some of the broad presidential power dicta in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
Lastly, Wilkinson argued that the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the United States should be given little weight. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, finding that licenses were not property; Skilling v. [read post]