Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 26,695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am
Smith (Federal Jurisdiction; Indian Country Land Status) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlUnited Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
The Court of Appeals reinstates the case.The case is Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
In 1947 in the case United Public Workers of America v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
The initiative, known as COVAX, includes 172 countries working in partnership “to ensure COVID-19 vaccines are available worldwide to both higher-income and lower-income countries. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:26 pm
The Supreme Court in Storer v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 2:05 pm
Washington and Colorado v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:53 am
II(1),(2),(3) [3] Id.Art I and V [4] National Mineral Corporation Plc. vs. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
Mesa and Ziglar v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
A similar knowledge gap also exists in other countries. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 2:09 pm
(Other than child pornography, in which case, go for it.)Judge Bennett says:"Border officials in our circuit are now constitutionally barred from forensically searching a traveler’s cell phone at the border, even if armed with reasonable suspicion the phone contains evidence of terrorist acts the traveler is about to commit in the United States; evidence the traveler is entering the United States under a false name; evidence of contemporaneous smuggling activity… [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 11:36 am
In the third suit, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:26 pm
’ Wang Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm
Before being appointed to the Arizona Supreme Court, Justice Bolick had been one of the leading libertarian lawyers in the country (he cofounded the Institute for Justice); this is from his opinion today in State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:49 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
The court considered a number of authorities in this regard, including X and Y v The Netherlands (App no 8978/80) and KU v Finland (App no 2872/02), in which the Strasbourg court had indicated that ECHR, art 8 placed a positive obligation on states to put in place effective deterrence measures against activities which may pose a threat to fundamental values and essential aspects of the private lives of individuals, particularly children and other vulnerable persons. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:49 pm
State Farm, 187 Cal. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:36 pm
The Supreme Court Justices determined in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
If you have not yet read United States v. [read post]
