Search for: "United States v. David" Results 5781 - 5800 of 6,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and now the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Diane Marie Amann
Many obituaries will focus on her prodigious and inspiring career in the United States: her journey, from a working-class upbringing in a single-parent family, to practice as a lawyer on child rights and in the Department of Justice, to service, in the District of Columbia Circuit, as the 1st woman Chief Judge of a U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:58 am by Ken Lopez
Litigating for or against the United States is a special situation. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:20 am by Matthew J. Sinkman
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also unlikely to take action. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:20 am by Matthew J. Sinkman
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also unlikely to take action. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:20 am by Matthew J. Sinkman
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also unlikely to take action. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The Editors Code of Practice, which is enforced by IPSO, states that corrections must be published “with due prominence. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
In an attempt to persuade Tory Rebels to vote against the Leveson 2 amendments, the government added an amendment 62BC which provides that the Secretary of State mandate a review of press regulators alternative dispute resolution procedures, Brian Cathcart considers this in an INFORRM post. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Manchin, Sinema Join with GOP in Rejecting Attempt to Change Filibuster Rules, Effectively Killing Democratic Voting Bill MSN – Mike DeBonis (Washington Post) | Published: 1/19/2022 The year-long Democratic push for federal voting rights legislation died in the Senate after Republicans blocked an elections bill for the fifth time in six months and Democrats failed to unite their caucus behind a plan to rewrite the chamber’s rules and pass it anyway. [read post]