Search for: "Doe"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 487,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 4:28 pm
The post What does 10% whole person impairment mean? [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm
"Does judicial disagreement imply ambiguity? [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:58 pm
Press release: "The Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and Energy (DOE) today announced the first phase of the Secure Freight... [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:15 pm
"What is inflation and how does the Federal Reserve measure it? [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:11 am
Under certain circumstances, the introduction of a co-conspirator’s statement against the defendant does not violate the Confrontation Clause of the 6th Amendment when the statements are made in furtherance of the conspiracy. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm
Doe. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:07 am
or My Uncle Sal does that, can’t we use him? [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:08 am
Walker's right to vote was not restored in any way that directly addressed his personal felony conviction, or the status of all felons, and so does not "count" under this analysis.So, no restoration and restoration without proper consideration are problematic.Judge Clay filed a dissent.The case is very dense and a good read to see just how detailed a statutory interpretation the Sixth is willing to go through. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:59 am
This does not benefit your case.Help your witness look at the jury in a way that enhances their credibility even as it satisfies jurors’ need to see the witness’s eyes to determine veracity. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 12:51 pm
Assuming that food sharing is a central tenet of Plaintiffs’ religious beliefs, the evidence does not show that enforcement of the Ordinance prohibits Plaintiffs’ meaningful ability to adhere to their faith or denies Plaintiffs reasonable opportunities to engage in fundamental religious activities....Plaintiffs show that the Ordinance certainly limits their ability to express their message in distributing sandwiches, but admit there is nothing about bologna sandwiches… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
The Commissioner of Education does not have jurisdiction to remove trustees or employees of public libraryDecisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision #17060In this appeal the applicant asked the Commissioner of Education to remove "the Library Director and the Board of Trustees" of a public library pursuant to Education Law §306. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:58 am
It does not, however, convince the Court that [defendant] should be judicially estopped from raising any defenses in this litigation. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
If I publish the work on my website a few weeks after mailing (or submitting) the copyright registration, how does the copyright office know that the work was indeed unpublished before I sent the application? [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:34 pm
Mendoza (82 NY2d 415 [1993]) held that a defendant does not have to sign an affidavit in support of a suppression motion, some local judges still believe they must. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
., March 10, 2017), the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision held that Title VII of the 1964 Civil rights Act does not protect against employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:05 am
Does the mark include a simulation of the Swiss flag [shown next below]? [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 10:37 am
Anything can happen....and usually does. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
., Dec. 8, 2023), a Virginia state trial court held that the ministerial exception doctrine does not prevent a former Administrative Dean for Acedemic Operations from suing Liberty University, a Christian University, for unlawfully terminating his employment because he engaged in whistleblower activities. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:21 am
This does not benefit your case.Help your witness look at the jury in a way that enhances their credibility even as it satisfies jurors’ need to see the witness’s eyes to determine veracity. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:09 am
Defendant does not challenge Plaintiffs’ assertion that [the corporate parent] — not [defendant] — engaged in the prior commercial activity . . . [read post]
