Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 15,557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2016, 12:10 pm
Which means figuring out which of the witnesses is correct. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:12 am
Padilla v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
That case was Johnson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
That case was Johnson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
But Korematsu v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:18 am
The decision (in Finnish) can be read here.(2) Craig Kelly summarizes the Judgement issued by the General Court of the European Union, in Tune v EUIPO, Case T-579/15 (Nov. 8).(3) Is “+” a “plus” or a “cross”? [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm
Yes, “for missions with very large delta-v requirements, having a propellant consumption rate of zero could offset the higher power requirements”. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm
If we're going to have a constitutional crisis, which is quite likely, better it be to prevent the sociopath from taking office than trying to figure out how to respond after he begins exercising all of the formidable powers of the modern presidency. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
The figures were expressed to the nearest whole number. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 8:53 am
Assn. of the Deaf v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Perhaps also, we should reconsider the decentralization v centralization binary as a central concern for how local government actually operates. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 1:37 pm
From the 2014 post by IPBiz --RIKEN investigation confirms Obokata paper on stem cells in Nature used doctored figures -- :Normile pointed to the role of bloggers in uncovering the problemsAlmost immediately after publication, bloggers in Japan and contributors to PubPeer, a website where scientists discuss published papers, started pointing out possibly manipulated images and apparently plagiarized text. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:47 am
Staff of 12 v. 10 for PTO recording division. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 11:37 am
Heck, it’s getting harder to figure out what’s not “trademark use” these days, as John Welch reports: The CAFC reversed the TTAB’s decision in adidas AG v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:18 am
The analyses creates figures demonstrating how much, if any, of an observed disparity in compensation can be traced to a given protected category (i.e. gender, race, or ethnicity), as opposed to any other potentially explanatory variable. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm
On 4 November, Mr Justice Nicol handed down an anonymised judgment in ERY v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2016] EWHC 2760 (QB)). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
In Skipper v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:33 am
"At that point, you (1) know what the case is about, and (2) can figure out the approximate sentence.And you'd be right. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
Breyer This remark was expounded at the Supreme Court earlier this month during a hearing in relation to Star Athletica L.L.C v Varsity Brands, Inc., et al.. [read post]
