Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 9,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 6:11 pm
Four of our 13 courts of appeals held that such a "reverse payment" pact does not, as a matter of law, run afoul of federal antitrust law. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
Mike went on to defend D.C. sniper Lee Malvo, in what was undoubtedly a letdown from Mike's high-profile representation of me in traffic court many years earlier.) [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:53 am
It touched on similar matters. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm
[D.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
At its June 13, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the constitutionality of the president’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, the constitutionality of a state law requiring pre-abortion ultrasounds, whether habeas proceedings can be used to challenge sex offender registration, common law immunity for foreign officials acting on behalf of foreign states, and whether equitable tolling is available under the Hague… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:31 am
And again, Hamdan II is what matters here. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:30 am
Clarke, 965 F.2d 1077, 1080 (D.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 12:29 pm
According to the D.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:30 am
The prosecutor addresses the Al-Qosi and monitoring matters together. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:55 am
Washington D.C. has about the same number of residents as we do here in Boston. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:30 am
Thus, if the en banc D.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Whatever the merits or consequences of how the D.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:43 am
The chains are no longer used as a matter of policy, Kammen says. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
No MJ memorabilia is worth prison time, no matter how big a fan you are. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 2:24 pm
While this case was being reviewed by the D.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
Washington, D.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Last week, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that it’s the final employment agreement that matters, and if the non-compete clause is in the final agreement, then it doesn’t matter if the clause was in the offer letter or not. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:30 pm
The relationship between parties has brought progress in Washington D.C. to a screeching halt. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:05 pm
SLM Corp., 659 F.3d 1204 (D.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
., 1996 WL 680992 (D.C. [read post]
