Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY" Results 5801 - 5820 of 9,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Borland International, Inc., 516 U.S. 233 (1996)]**There is a New Jersey connection in this matter. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:11 am by Ben Vernia
Because it was the utility authority (and the state of New Jersey) who were at risk, the relator’s federal claims failed. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:02 pm
  United States v. $487,825.00 in United States Currency, No. 06-3138 (3d Cir. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:08 am by Steven Cohen
CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al – United States District Court – District of New Jersey – January 3rd, 2018) involves injuries sustained after defendant police officers pulled over the plaintiff in his vehicle. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 12:19 pm by Steven Cohen
AM GENERAL, LLC et al – United States District Court – District Court of New Jersey – August 4th, 2017) involves a claim of asbestos exposure. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:08 am by Steven Cohen
CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al – United States District Court – District of New Jersey – January 3rd, 2018) involves injuries sustained after defendant police officers pulled over the plaintiff in his vehicle. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:31 am by Steven Cohen
  As executive director of a camp in Sussex, New Jersey, he has established and implemented camp policies, practices, and procedures. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 7:54 pm by Robert A. Epstein
Neither party shall permanently relocate with the Children from the State of New Jersey without the prior written consent of the other. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 7:54 pm by Robert A. Epstein
Neither party shall permanently relocate with the Children from the State of New Jersey without the prior written consent of the other. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
The Second Department's decision accepted MHS's argument without elaboration and vacated the order dismissing the petition, writing as follows: A claim for dissolution of a foreign limited liability company is one over which the New York courts lack subject matter jurisdiction (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d 799; Matter of Porciello v Sound Moves, 253 AD2d 467; Matter of Warde-McCann v Commex, Ltd., 135 AD2d 541). [read post]