Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 5801 - 5820
of 10,086
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
Section 727(e) provides - (e) The trustee, a creditor, or the United States trustee may request a revocation of a discharge— (1) under subsection (d)(1) of this section within one year after such discharge is granted; or (2) under subsection (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this section before the later of— (A) one year after the granting of such discharge; and (B) the date the case is closed. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
”); Maurice Tubiana, Ludwig E. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:50 pm
§ 41.77(b). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:39 am
§ 271, including as follows: (a) by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling in the United States or importing into the United States computer software and/or hardware and/or systems, and/or by engaging in or practicing in the United States methods or processes covered by the Patents-in-Suit, including such methods or processes which utilize one or more of the Accused Products [those products of Interactive which are claimed to infringe on Verint's… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
”13 Viacom v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:19 am
Anani v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
When asked why his support payments were discontinued for a portion of the four-month period, Father stated, “I do not know. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
The panel discussed the Court’s two big cases involving same-sex marriage, United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
The panel discussed the Court’s two big cases involving same-sex marriage, United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Since the United States Supreme Court recognized agency amicus interpretations as a source of controlling law entitled to deference in Auer v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a state’s about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the state’s chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel erred under SEC… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury, along with their respective Secretaries (Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:41 am
Well, for one, it is so obvious that the Charter of Values infringes freedom of conscience and religion under section 2(a) of the Canadian Charter, as it was most famously described by Chief Justice Dickson in R. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
In RPL Central Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2013] FCA 871, 30 August 2013, Middleton J confirmed that the question of patentability under Australian law is to be guided by the seminal and watershed decision of the Australian High Court in NRDC v Commissioner (1959) 102 CLR 252. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
David B. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:08 am
Section 605(e)(3)(B)(iii). [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
