Search for: "State v. Key"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 20,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2008, 5:32 pm
Frazzini v. [read post]
28 May 2025, 11:54 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
WSJ Law Blog notes “another odd twist in an already odd case”: Georgia prosecutors cannot schedule Davis’s execution “because federal regulators have seized the state’s entire supply of a key lethal injection drug”; the Associated Press also has coverage of the story. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:23 am
Citing Braxton v Mendelson, 233 NY 122, the court said that a number of elements may be helpful in attempting to decide the question. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 11:21 am
The key issue in the license plate case (Walker v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:13 am
On June 23, 2015, the Ninth Circuit in Cabral v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 1:11 pm
In the post-eBay v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:31 pm
With Steyn J stating that the appeal has a “real prospect of success”, it appears that Cadwalladr is not out of the woods yet. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
In The Carlson Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 12:03 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:09 pm
That is what happened in Promega Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:16 am
In Schooner Peggy the key constraint was a treaty; in Little v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
The key is what relationship a right must stand to citizens of the United States to count. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:13 am
Evid. 403; United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as plaintiffs elected to accept the settlement without asserting their current claim that they were entitled to an additional amount representing the architectural and engineering fees, the settlement gave rise to an accord and satisfaction (see Gimper, Inc. v Giacchetta, 221 AD2d 682, 684 [1995]; Hemingway v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:12 am
Andrusiek v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 3:31 am
That ruling was handed down in Conte v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
If the FDA has already reviewed the risk at issue and has approved labeling that deals with it, state law cannot deem inadequate the labeling that the FDA approved.The key here is something we first posted about over a year ago, and that's the clear regulatory history that limits to new information the "changes being effected" ("CBE") exception to FDA pre-approval. [read post]
