Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 5801 - 5820 of 133,202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 7:58 am by Dan Farber
I should mention one more issue in the case, although it may not apply to EPA. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
While there may be something to the argument for a right to receive speech anonymously, I predict that that is not  the primary issue on which court decisions related to age-verification laws will turn. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this year, using as a springboard the Maryland intermediate appellate court’s decision in Eastland Food Corp. v Mekhaya, I posted about a topic on which there’s little or no New York law, viz., whether a complaint for minority shareholder oppression stated a valid claim centered on allegations that the directors/majority shareholders, instead of declaring profit distributions for all shareholders, were taking disguised distributions in the form of excessive… [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:30 am by Gareth Davies
Blogpost 36/2023 WS v Frontex, case T-600/21, decided by the General Court on the 6th of September 2023, concerns a number of Syrian nationals who arrived in 2016 on the Greek island of Milos with the intention of claiming asylum. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am by Felix Mikolasch
Data subjects may bring a claim directly against a controller or processor in court. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Collins Rice J stated that “it is both parties’ task to undertake disciplined efforts to think about, and check carefully, all the information they have which may be relevant to the claim as pleaded, to account for it all to each other, and exchange their evidence about it, “in good time. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
The judge also says it may have questioned venue if it had realized that both the plaintiff and many of the defendants were located in Vietnam. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Here's a NYT article from last May: "New York City Asks for Relief From Its Right-to-Shelter Mandate/City officials say that the arrival of 65,000 asylum seekers has presented the city 'with challenges never contemplated, foreseeable or indeed even remotely imagined.'"The mandate comes from a consent decree in the 1981 case Callahan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]