Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 19,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2020, 1:05 pm
But, fearing for your life, you still don't want to testify. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
But such a holding seems to be so potentially wrong that I'm not at all sure that's what Justice McKinster actually means.Part of the opinion seems obviously right. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:28 am
And the result may be still be to restrict family legal aid significantly. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:49 pm
On June 30, 2014, the US Supreme Court decided the case of Burwell v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:56 pm
The Court heard argument that morning in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm
Our deal still stands. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
The latest "Supreme Court Today" newsletter by Aaron Streett of Baker Botts (available here) includes these thoughtful speculations about who's hard at work on the Cunningham case still pending before SCOTUS:ASSIGNMENT WATCH: Two opinions remain of the 9 from the October sitting, and 2 Justices have not yet written opinions — RBG and SGB. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:23 pm
The decision in Nunez-Reyes v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:23 pm
The decision in Nunez-Reyes v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Educated at Balliol Oxford, by way of Harrow and The Inns of Court School of Law. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
What this provision requires was clarified [as recalled at para 59] by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its 2011 decision in L'Oréal:1. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Lord Toulson gave the leading judgment (with whom all the other Justices agreed). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
On appeal by the Crown, the Ontario High Court of Justice reversed the lower court’s decision, finding that the trial judge erred in law in concluding that Mr. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:57 am
Justice requires no less.Jencks v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
BALLETTA, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment insofar as appealed from, with the following memorandum: While it is true that the court is empowered to make decisions concerning the possession of marital property "as justice requires" despite the failure of the underlying divorce action (Domestic Relations Law § 234; Brady v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:28 pm
In Lickiss v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s June 28 decision in Fischer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:10 pm
Barco v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:44 am
Four Supreme Court justices are accompanied on the bench today by the Lord Chief Justice, marking the significance of these criminal appeals. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
In 1971, in a case called Bivens v. [read post]
