Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 6,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
It is wishful thinking, therefore, to argue, as Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con) does, that: Is not it true that the recent case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom specifically allows the Government to proceed with a range of policy options, which, like the consultation in 2009, could be put out for public discussion? [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
United States Food and Drug Admin., Civ. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Last summer, tech companies followed suit, with CEOs including Elon Musk signing an Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Chemical Weapons. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:55 am
United States Amended versions of the proposed Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act — also known as COPPA 2.0 — and the Kids Online Safety Act were approved for House f [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
“There should be a clear legal recognition of Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism,” Zelenskyy said. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:23 am
See David Hart’s post about religious no-go zones. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
” But in The Washington Post, David Wiegel reports that Sen. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
On reflection: Dietemann v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v) It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
V. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
The ruling, which is awaiting tomorrow’s hearing in draft form, would drop a heavy load on Miller, including these provisions, including the appointment of George David Lapsley as the court’s expert for the case duration and accepts the United States motion on the issues. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
The conduct was certainly disturbing, but the court, in Washington v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:22 am
Bynum, Brief for the United States 2008 WL 4974084. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 419 (2012) (Scalia, J., dissenting). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
She wrote the court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
United States, Pam Karlan in Lozman v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:56 am
The Ninth Circuit emphatically rejected the state action argument in PragerU v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
United Kingdom (1980), 3 E.H.R.R. 408 (Comm.), at p. 415, applied in Re F (in utero), supra. [read post]
