Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 5821 - 5840 of 14,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2011, 5:30 am by Janet Lindenmuth
Ch. 1952), aff’d, 91 A.2d 137 (Del. 1952) (which eventually became part of Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:29 am by Kiera Flynn
Analysis of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:09 pm by Lawrence Solum
In his dissent, Marshall argues that the Milliken decision represents a “giant step backwards,” away from the desegregative and egalitarian orientation of Brown v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am by Daniel Jin
The secretary of state can direct airport operators to detain Russian aircraft in U.K. airspace and the CAA may refuse, suspend or revoke permissions for Russian aircraft; and[v] Luxury goods: Other measures include a ban on the export of high-end luxury goods to Russia and higher import tariffs on key Russian goods. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in questioning Judge Jackson last week, Texas Senator John Cornyn repeatedly referred to the right to same-sex marriage, which the Supreme Court recognized in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am by Shannon O'Hare
SPECIAL THANKS We appreciate the assistance of Emmanuelle Naulais at Brown Rudnick, Paris Office with the following discussion on French, law, regulation and practice. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:52 am by Kiran Bhat
Federal Election Commission and Freeman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:34 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 The Court concluded: Inasmuch as there was no evidence, other than her presence, that specifically connected defendant to the apartment where the contraband was found, "the People failed to prove that [she] exercised dominion and control over the contraband, and therefore failed to prove the possession element of the counts as charged" (People v Brown, 133 AD3d 772, 773 [2d Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1143 [2016]; see generally People… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 6:33 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This time around, the plaintiff argues that the trial court on remand violated the Second Circuit's mandate in granting the officers' motion for qualified immunity.The case is Brown v. [read post]