Search for: "California Law Review"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 29,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
So, grab the leftover fudge and cookies, as well as a strong cup of coffee, and spend some time reviewing the new developments. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:20 am
Following up on my previous post, California Bar Flags Over 3,000 Applicants For Video Review Of Their October Online Exams; Deans Request That Applicants Be Permitted To Sit For February Exam As They Await Resolution: Bloomberg Law, Ninety Percent of Suspected Cheaters Cleared by California Bar: The list of test... [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 8:11 am
Gabriel Jackson Chin and Hannah Bogen (University of California, Davis - School of Law and affiliation not provided to SSRN) have posted Warren Court Incrementalism and Indigent Criminal Appellants’ Right to Trial Transcripts (51 University of the Pacific Law Review... [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 8:03 am
Modifications should be reviewed by legal counsel and placed in writing. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 8:03 am
Modifications should be reviewed by legal counsel and placed in writing. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
A summary of 2020 case law and legislative updates includes the following hot topics: CALIFORNIA WATER RIGHTS AND SUPPLY WATER QUALITY WETLANDS AIR QUALITY & CLIMATE CHANGE RENEWABLE ENERGY ENDANGERED SPECIES HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & REMEDIATION NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (“NEPA”) MINING, OIL AND GAS STREAMBED ALTERATION AGREEMENTS FOREST RESOURCES CULTURAL RESOURCES PROTECTION ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT GENERAL REAL ESTATE COMMON INTEREST DEVELOPMENTS REAL… [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 2:00 am
Bohr, an attorney with Tiffany & Bosco, P.A., practices employment and labor law, with an emphasis in HR management counseling, litigation, class actions, and other HR matters She is a frequent speaker on a wide range of employment law topics. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 9:50 pm
Below are my 2020 labor and employment law predictions and my review of them. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 9:09 am
This article is part of our Year in Review series. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 10:36 am
Four deaths were reported from California (2), Hawaii, and New Jersey. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: The "brothel law" of La Crosse, Wisconsin (Racquet Press). [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
In an article in the Brooklyn Law Review, Nebraska College of Law’s Justin (Gus) Hurwitz explains that the TCPA bans robocalls without the “prior express consent” of the receiver. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 6:05 pm
The post 2020 Year In Review for Zaller Law Group appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:03 am
This article is part of our Year in Review series. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 6:14 am
While not all-inclusive due to the fact that M&A+I events are not always publicly disclosed and some announcements may not represent event completion, the abridged listing of M&A+I events maintained by ComplexDiscovery notes key industry events by sharing event date, company involvement, and known event amounts. eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in Q4 2020 Based on an aggregate review of the abridged listing through the lens of Q4 2020, the following findings, data… [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am
” California saw record wildfires. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
In a statement, the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California stated that the curfews violated the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:11 am
In a lengthy review of the law applying the ADA to websites the California 2nd Court of Appeals declined to decide the issue under state law, finding that because the website in question did have a nexus to a physical place of business “we need not consider here the wholly hypothetical question whether Title III of the ADA governs a website unconnected to a physical place of public accommodation offering only purely Internet-based services or products. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 7:41 pm
Employers should consult with counsel upon reviewing each of the Rule’s mandates to ensure compliance. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
The court held that the plaintiff’s claims were preempted by California law and fell exclusively within the authority of the CPUC. [read post]
