Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 5821 - 5840 of 26,253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 12:40 pm by Scott Andrews
The determination of good or bad faith in an insurer's deciding to proceed to trial involves the weighing of such factors, among others, as the probability of the insured's liability, the extent of the damages incurred by the claimant, the amount of the policy limits, the adequacy of the insurer's investigation, and the openness of communications between the insurer and the insured. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:46 pm by Mary E. Hodges
  In June of 2011, a FINRA Arbitration Panel awarded a Claimant with a substantial punitive damage award. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 2:16 pm
In a perfect world, a person seeking Social Security Disability benefits will support his or her claim with a detailed record of regular medical treatment, explaining the claimant's impairments and how they affect his or her functioning. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 10:10 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Here is a quote from the abstract:[Q]uasi-property provides the essential model for assessing the interest held by a privacy claimant against a defendant, and whether it has been infringed. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:03 pm
While the association’s insurance carrier will, in most cases indemnify (pay) the homeowner claimant for damages caused to the homeowner and/or their property, the insurance carrier will not (in most cases) pay the cost of repairing the common area (the leaking roof, deck, window, stucco, etc.) that is leaking or leaked. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:11 pm by Jon Gelman
Today's post is shared from insurancejournal.com/The Florida Supreme Court is considering whether to declare the state’s workers’ compensation attorney fee schedule unconstitutional.The court recently heard oral arguments in a case (Castellanos v. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 3:29 pm by NL
At trial, the Claimant's evidence was accepted. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 3:29 pm by NL
At trial, the Claimant's evidence was accepted. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm by Shaun McParland Baldwin
The court concluded that the insured’s statement that it owned the trademark suggested that the claimant did not have a right to it and, as a result, degraded the claimants products by implication. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:33 pm by Brent Wieand
The medical expert’s testimony mirrored that of the claimant. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:14 pm by Scott Calvert
  Overstatement of and excessive reliance upon claimants activities in the surveillance videos and conducting a paper review rather than an “in-person medical evaluation. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:53 am by JT
Kim v Orourke, 2010 NY Slip Op 01613 (2d Dept. 2010) “The defendant’s own examining neurologist reported findings of limitations in the ranges of motion in the cervical and lumbar regions of the injured plaintiff’s spine (see Powell v Prego, 59 AD3d 417; Norme v Ajons, 57 AD3d 749; Wright v AAA Constr. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It was also large enough to compensate all the claimants. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:04 am by Jason Shinn
At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigator often prepared a report containing detailed factual findings, even if the investigation did not disclose sufficient evidence to support the claimants allegations. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 8:36 am
” In citing prior case law, the Court explained, “[T]he discovery rule, as incorporated by the legislature in [Section 311], calls for more than an employee’s suspicion, intuition or belief; by its terms, the statute’s notice period is triggered only by an employee’s knowledge that [he] is injured and that [his] injury is possibly related to [his] job. [read post]