Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 5821 - 5840 of 29,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2019, 6:41 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Whether the defendant contributed to the circumstances which give rise to the request for a continuance; f. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Even if documents appear to support the defendant's case, the plaintiff can get around that if she finds the right witnesses to show that management did not always follow its light duty policies. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
But that does not mean that the defendant has the right to an entrapment defense. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am by MBettman
No: Justices Kennedy, DeWine and former Justice O’Donnell Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 2744.07(A)(2)(Defending and Indemnifying Employees)(political subdivisions must indemnify judgments entered against their employees for good faith conduct within the scope of employment.) [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
“[I]f we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 1:34 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Section 6(f)(1) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1)) provides that a registrant of a pesticide product may at any time request that any of its pesticide registrations be canceled or amended to terminate one or more uses. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 pm by Tom Kosakowski
The European Network of Ombudsmen in Higher Education has posted the agenda for its fifteenth annual conference, "Defending and Protecting Rights within Higher Education: Stocktaking, Looking Ahead," hosted by the University of León June 26-28, 2019. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 (The Ninth Circuit has held that in nominative fair use cases (which this is), the defendant’s only burden is to show that the use is referential (which MC pled), after which the burden shifts back to the plaintiff to show lack of entitlement to the defense.) [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:24 am by Michael Lowe
From a criminal defense standpoint, the thing to keep in mind is that any straight dismissal will make the defendant eligible for an expunction — as long as there’s no other case arising out of the same transaction which isn’t eligible for expunction. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mendelsohn v Ross, 251 F Supp 3d 518 [ED NY]; see Broadwall Am., Inc. v Bram Will-El LLC, 32 AD3d 748, 750). [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
TheCourt added: “After all, ‘[f]ew . . . litigants would spend$50,000 to defend a $5,000 claim. [read post]