Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 5821 - 5840 of 8,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm
On 20 August 2003, the agent obtained the car accident report. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm by Florian Mueller
The related part of the order does not mention the USPTO's first Office action tentatively rejecting all claims of this patent, but that first Office action was notified to the court and may very well have influenced Judge Koh's thinking. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 8:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
She also pled guilty to DWI and was traveling at approximately 20 miles per hour with her foot on the gas at the time of impact. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm by Bexis
”  Id. at 32.Levine “does not categorically extend to all claims,” and in particular does not extend to design claims, because “because a manufacturer cannot unilaterally alter the design (unlike the labeling) of a drug. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:43 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Bronx DWI Lawyer said that, the defendant remained at the party for 1 1/2 to 2 hours before leaving in his pickup truck. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 3:07 pm
On 20 August 2008, plaintiff-two filed her own separate action against defendants in Nassau County. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:26 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Sheriffs face two big barriers to passing their blue warrant bill: 1) the Legislature does not appear to be in the mood to pick up more county costs (e.g., a request to pay for unfunded mandates related to indigent defense was rebuffed in the initial House and Senate budgets.), and 2) Governor Rick Perry already vetoed legislation to allow bail for parole violators six years ago, so as long as he's Governor, he's the main person that needs convincing. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am by Marty Lederman
  More recently, in footnote 20 of its 1997 decision in Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
A preliminary element of many of the prohibitions under the CFAA focuses on whether a defendant accessed a computer "without authorization" or "exceed[ing] authorized access." [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
A preliminary element of many of the prohibitions under the CFAA focuses on whether a defendant accessed a computer "without authorization" or "exceed[ing] authorized access." [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:54 am by Venkat
" [image credit: malchev/Shuttersock : "Set of 20 Square Avatars"] [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:55 am by Larry Catá Backer
 (Pix from Tom Phillips, Former student at University of Leeds to defend Bo Xilai in court,The Telegragh (UK) (Jan. 13, 2013) ("Beijing-based lawyer Li Guifang confirmed this week that he would represent Bo Xilai, the former Communist Party chief of Chongqing, at his forthcoming trial for corruption and an alleged role in the murder of British businessman Neil Heywood. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Does counterfeiting result in contamination for consumers of authentic brands? [read post]