Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 15,479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2018, 8:12 am
Clarke and Upper Skagit are clear: (1) litigation should not be the primary device to resolve disputes with any sovereign government and (2) there is no legal basis to impose different legal principles as between State and tribal sovereigns unless Congress, vested with plenary power vis-à-vis tribes in the Constitution, expressly articulates one. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:11 am
Two things people with opinions might wish to opine about before the Memorial Day holiday arrives: 1. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:18 pm
Recently, the ABA has been sued by Western Michigan University Thomas Cooley School of Law, and two InfiLaw schools: Florida Coastal School of Law and the defunct Charlotte School of Law. [read post]
22 May 2018, 12:27 pm
You can base your challenge on several arguments: 1. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:20 am
Court #1 should not control the declarations of Court #2. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:05 am
Jan. 23, 2018). [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
Federal law doesn’t regulate the mining of uranium, but it does regulate uranium processing and the handling of the tailings left over afterwards. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:56 am
There are some qualifications to the grey list for financial services contracts at paragraphs 22 and 23 of Part 2 of Schedule 2 to the CRA. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:50 am
That argument, however, does not suggest thatthe Board shifted the burden of proof to Anacor, butinstead is directed to the question whether there wassubstantial evidence to support the Board’s finding ofobviousness. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:39 am
POWELL No. 1:16-CV-02491-TWP-DML, 2018 WL 1070296 (S.D. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:29 am
Shinseki, 23 Vet. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:29 am
Shinseki, 23 Vet. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
The patent proprietor has appealed against the Opposition Division's decision to revoke European patent No. 1 819 382.The decision, dispatched on 23 January 2013, was based on the ground that the subject-matter of claim 1 of all requests admitted into the proceedings extended beyond the content of the application as originally filed. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
The patent proprietor has appealed against the Opposition Division's decision to revoke European patent No. 1 819 382.The decision, dispatched on 23 January 2013, was based on the ground that the subject-matter of claim 1 of all requests admitted into the proceedings extended beyond the content of the application as originally filed. [read post]
15 May 2018, 5:37 am
Tax reform does not need to be a one-year effort. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Petitioner Weyerhaeuser Company filed its opening brief on April 23, 2018. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Annab does not contend that her injuries were caused by a “condition” of tangible personal property. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:29 am
No. 23 (Dec. 20, 2017), the Tax Court held that the Commissioner’s burden of production under Section 7491(c) includes establishing compliance with the written supervisory approval requirement of Section 6751(b). [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:03 am
Here’s what else they found: 1. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:52 am
" Except that it does; see, e.g., MPEP § 2111.05(III); Ex parte Kouznetsov, No. 2007-003470 (B.P.A.I. [read post]
