Search for: "English v. English" Results 5821 - 5840 of 11,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB - Read judgment The case of OPQ v BJM addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
”  Cy pres, as regular readers of the 1643 revised edition of the English Reports know only too well, originates from common-law limitations on the strictness of the mortmain rules requiring forfeiture of property disposed of other than to a legal heir. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by war
Alcon Inc v Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1299 [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:57 am
Last week the IPKat, intrigued by a reference for a ruling for a preliminary ruling of the European Court of Justice in a case he knew nothing about, Case C-4/10 Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac v Oy Gust. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:41 am by Susanne Gössl
Anonymised abstracts in German or English (max. 500 words) must be submitted by 8 January 2021 only via the application form on the conference website. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
The ‘consequential’ losses suffered in England were accordingly sufficient to ground English jurisdiction for the tort claims. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:07 pm by Ray Dowd
The Act does not grant the holder the windfall of both monopoly and reimbursement for its maintenance.Description: The Boston Tea Party, protesting the English tax on tea. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:45 pm
Amid a fervent verbal duel over English and American legal history, between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen G. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Regner and Jacob Dougherty (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), on Saturday, February 10, 2024 Tags: Controller, delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Kahn v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:00 am by Emily Siu
  Unfortunately, just because a provision makes sense in plain English, this does not necessarily mean that it is enforceable in court. [read post]