Search for: "Louisiana Supreme Court"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 6,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2007, 1:46 pm
The Shabazz court concluded that the privacy concerns that led the Supreme Court to require probable cause in other cases are not as pronounced with a saliva swab because it is not as intrusive as a blood test or a surgical bullet-removal procedure. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:55 am
Fifth Circuit decision Citing the Supreme Court's ruling on loss causation in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:42 am
Mason and the partner got out from under; there was no evidence to indicate that the partner was ever involved in any of this, and Mason’s office was positioned to argue the same thing, buttressed further by the broad absolute immunity a prosecutor generally enjoys and the Supreme Court’s earlier decision this year in Connick v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
Sex-based classifications very similar to the ‘unchastity of a woman’ rule have been struck down by the United States Supreme Court as violative of the equal protection clause…. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
(The Supreme Court, of course, paid absolutely no attention to Hamilton’s assurances in deciding in July that electors could actually be turned into mindless minions of whoever voted them into office, the one example at the national leve [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:06 pm
, the state's Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of All Saints, Pawleys Island that seemed to suggest that the Episcopal Church -- and any other similarly structured church organization like the Presbyterians and Methodists -- does not have a legal interest in parish property held in trust by the Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
As in many other areas of the law, Justice Anthony Kennedy often provided the key fifth vote in death penalty cases during his three decades on the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm
§ 2254(d)(1), by granting habeas relief on the ground that the Nevada Supreme Court unreasonably applied “clearly established Federal law, as determined by” this Court when it held that respondent’s right to present a defense was not violated by the exclusion of extrinsic evidence through which he sought to impeach a prosecution witness on a collateral matter. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
The state Supreme Court should very carefully evaluate whether to clear the way for more executions using the "chemical cocktail. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 10:05 pm
In front of the Louisiana Supreme Court there is a statue of Justice Edward Douglass White, who served on both the Louisiana Supreme Court and, for 26 years, on the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
Oklahoma, 15-9173, won a per curiam reversal, in which the court held that the Oklahoma Supreme Court was wrong to declare that Payne v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
An elderly client in Louisiana hired the defendant to complete a real estate transaction in Hawaii. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Did the Supreme Court's decision in Amoco Prod. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:18 pm
Mallard Bay Drilling, 534 US 235 (2002), the US Supreme Court held that inspected vessels were governed by Coast Guard regulations, which preempt OSHA regulations; on uninspected vessels though, OSHA is not preempted. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
Sebelius cases now pending in the Supreme Court will likely determine whether employers with faith-based philosophies will challenge their obligation to comply with these laws. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court requires that bail decisions should be based on the risk factor posed by a defendant to the public and the individual's financial resources, in Harris County in 2009, magistrates lowered bond amounts for financial reasons less than 10 percent of the time. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am
Fundamentally, the question is which institution ought to guide voting rights policy at this moment of transition: should it be Congress or the Supreme Court? [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
June 15, 2023 | Bryn Hines Civil rights attorney argues that recent Supreme Court religious liberty cases jeopardize antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:51 am
If they then try to leave, they are toast.Same Bishop: But that's not what the South Carolina Supreme Court says. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
(Federalist 57) The supreme court has said that the constitution and the history thereof are silent on the matter of civil law and ex post facto, therefore it is allowed.. [read post]
