Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 5821 - 5840 of 19,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2021, 1:02 pm by Michael DelSignore
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts decided this in the case of Harrington v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
So, to get back on track here, drugs found in the presence of several people requires that the state prove the person charge had (1) dominion and control, plus (2) knowledge of the contraband's presence. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am by Addie Rolnick
In general, though, legal Indianness requires indigenous ancestry (descent from a group indigenous to what is now the United States) and some kind of political recognition. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(United States) Company quickly realized it needed to deal with TM online. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
  It raises one question: “Whether the right of the people to keep and bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is incorporated into the Due Process Clause or the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment so as to be applicable to the staes, thereby invalidating ordinances prohibiting possession of handguns in the home. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
See also United States v Power, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 20-po-331-GLS), 2023 WL 131050, and United States v Robertson, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 22-po-867-GLS), 2023 WL 131051, *12 ("[T]he Court… [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 4:32 pm by LTA-Editor
Facebook Ireland is subject to European Union data protection laws, which are stronger than those in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:49 pm
  Cases brought by plaintiffs in the United States under the ATS represent the largest body of domestic jurisprudence on corporate responsibility for violations of international human rights law. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:16 pm by Kevin
The idea that a private company would decide what is free speech and what is not protected free speech under the United States Constitution seems pretty far fetched. [read post]