Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 6,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
If the EP decides to vote against the JURI mandate, every MEP will be able to file an amendment to the JURI report in the next plenary session in September. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 6:45 am
In National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:30 am
Public Citizen helped pass 14 energy efficiency and renewable energy bills in the Texas legislative session. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am
If the EP decides to vote against the JURI mandate, every MEP will be able to file an amendment to the JURI report in the next plenary session in September. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
Consider one recent example: by a vote of eight to zero, the Justices reversed the Ninth Circuit decision in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:26 am
This leads to a rare potential victory for someone who illegally came to the U.S. from Indonesia, and who is seeking to reopen his asylum case.From Sihotang v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
ITEX Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:12 pm
This was, of course, the Act at issue in Monsanto v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
On the moment the news broke about Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO Copyright Committee 16th session to discuss Broadcast Treaty, new proposal for exceptions and limitations agreement: (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (IPwar’s), (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI), (Public Knowledge), (IP Justice), (IP Justice), (KEI),… [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Haugen dropped his appeals and his execution was imminent, Governor Kitzhaber was prompted to issue a reprieve, which read, in part: WHEREAS, Oregon’s application of the death penalty is not fairly and consistently applied, and I do not believe that state-sponsored executions bring justice; NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Article V, Section 14 of the Oregon Constitution, I, John A. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Harris v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Harris v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:37 pm
STRICT AND INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND TREATMENT In the United States Supreme Court case of Kansas V. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
It is tailor-made to ensure that public figures do not have to be worried about New York Times v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:11 am
I have also enjoyed working with Bob and Tracy on some projects, including some pro bono amicus briefs in the Supreme Court (including in McConnell v. [read post]
