Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 19,222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:18 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
Timelines, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
-- Could the Religious-Liberty Principle that Catholics Established in Perez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:17 pm
Concluding that Apple’s store design trademark met all three requirements, the court stated:[T]he representation, by a design alone, without indicating the size or the proportions, of the layout of a retail store, may be registered as a trade mark . [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
" For the petition for writ of certiorari: https://www.eff.org/document/eff-v-doj-petition-writ-certiorari For more on this case: https://www.eff.org/foia/foia-secret-surveillance-law-memo Contacts: Mark Rumold Staff Attorney Electronic Frontier Foundation mark@eff.org David Sobel Senior Counsel Electronic Frontier Foundation sobel@eff.org Share this: || Join EFF [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 12:02 pm
Trade Marks and E-CommerceImage by Riana HarveyMarcel Pemsel discussed the General Court decision (Case T-79/23) about the conflict between the application to register the words ‘CHIQUITA QUEEN’ and the existing registration for a figurative mark comprising the words RED QUEEN for ‘fresh fruits’. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:42 am
Resnick v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 3:44 am
Patty’s Original Cheese Zombies, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:55 am
Heasley).The TTAB has (almost always) followed the principle laid down by the CAFC in Herbko v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:14 am
Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437 (1991) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:07 pm
United States, 62 F.4th 221 (6th Cir. 2023). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
However, starting with United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 5:20 am
Shire United States, Inc., CA NO. 08-941 2009 U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:19 am
Love v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:34 pm
The High Court issued a brief statement in which it stated: ‘At least a majority of the Court is of the opinion that the Act is not contrary to s 51(xxxi). [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:24 am
Mark Spottswood (U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 5:01 pm
This marks the 700th post for the blog. [read post]
