Search for: "State v. Price" Results 5821 - 5840 of 13,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
In July, JP Morgan also cut the weighting of Venezuelan bonds to “zero-weight”, causing prices to fall and forcing holders to sell their positions at severely distressed prices. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
  Some have called this a "great victory for free software" and that "the ruling ‘preserves the effectiveness of antitrust enforcement… in fast moving markets.'" [19]  The EU competition commissioner has stated that she was pleased with the findings of the court, stating that "Microsoft can no longer prevent the market from functioning properly… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The Court observed that the state bar placed: particular emphasis on the adverse effects that it feels price advertising will have on the legal profession. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Docket: 07-512 Case name: Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications Issue: Whether Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act permits a "price squeeze" claim if the defendant has no duty to deal. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf) John F. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm by Jeffrey W. Berkman, Esq.
 Amount of Shares -- The amount of shares offered can be stated as an exact number or as a percentage of the outstanding shares. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Pre-1931: Sherman Act (speech about prices); Pure Food and Drug Act; state blue sky securities laws; professional licensing laws. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:43 am by Florian Mueller
Apple, the App Store antitrust case that the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear in 2 1/2 weeks.I discussed Epic v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 4:58 am
Last Thursday however, the Third Department affirmed a dismissal of the class action suit finding that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action in Baron v Pfizer, Inc., 2007 NY Slip Op 05813. [read post]