Search for: "Study v. State" Results 5821 - 5840 of 15,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Law Society of British Columbia', (Forthcoming in the University of British Columbia Law Review, (2017) Volume 50:3).Clifford Rosky, Still Not Equal: A Report from the Red States, (After Marriage Equality: The Future of LGBT Rights pgs. 73-101 (2016)).SSRN (Islamic Law)Hae Won Bang, Production of Islamic Knowledge in the European Diaspora: A Case Study of Digital Texts from a British Muslim Halal Certifier, (May 30, 2016).Mmaphuti David Tuba, Lodhi 5 Properties Investments… [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:00 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (ERFINDERGEMEINSCHAFT UROPEP GbR v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:00 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (ERFINDERGEMEINSCHAFT UROPEP GbR v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A California patient privacy case has reached the state´s Supreme Court. [read post]
13 May 2017, 10:22 am by Schachtman
The case, which has gained this recent notoriety is Lois Slemp v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 1:33 pm by Andrew Hamm
Dyk noted that when he studied criminal law at Harvard Law School in 1961, the subject was taught without reference to criminal procedure. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:18 am by Arthur F. Coon
When all was said and done, it was a case of “same wine, different bottle” for Defendant and Appellant San Mateo Community College District (“District”) after the First District Court of Appeal’s published May 5, 2017 decision, following remand from the California Supreme Court, in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 11:13 pm by Thalia Kruger
Straw, the present study underlines throughout Section II the approach to this case, linked with the “Extraordinary Renditions Programme”, of the United States, and with tortures as well as unlawful detention suffered by the plaintiffs, in which the British Government is denounced as an accomplice. [read post]
7 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
The Supreme Court put a halt to that absurd practice in its opinion in United States v. [read post]