Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 5821 - 5840 of 55,066
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[9] Thus, for instance, that some people are offended or alienated by an employee's religion does not justify the employer in firing the employee. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
In other words, this position perpetuates and reinforces “colonial narratives about the inferiority of Indigenous peoples, their laws, and ideas regarding land and property ownership” (p. 43). [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm by David Kopel
Such laws did exist, but only for people who were considered not to have civil rights: slaves (who were either blacks or Indians) or free people of color (again, blacks or Indians). [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
The case arose from a question concerning the application of Lithuanian law requiring people in receipt of public funds to file declarations of interest. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Wong Professor of Law at Cornell Law School. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
For a different perspective of the matter, see footnote 2 in People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am by Sandy Levinson
  His words were almost literally law; more to the point, they were viewed as such by most members of the community. [read post]