Search for: "York v York"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 51,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2021, 2:15 pm
In Clark v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v Vullo, (NY App.Div., July 2, 2020), a New York state appellate court rejected a challenge by several religious organizations and other plaintiffs to a New York administrative regulation requiring health insurance policies in New York to provide coverage for medically necessary abortion services. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 4:05 am
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 12:25 pm
Great mix of articles on cutting edge law firm management issues.Teaching Legal Research to the Google Generation By Janet Accardo, Director of Library Services at Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NYPaying Attention to the Canaries in KM's Mineshaft By V. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in People of the State of New York v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 4:00 am
In Stephens v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 2:32 pm
The 2010 New York trial at issue in McCray v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:28 am
In McMillan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 7:49 am
The complaint (full text) in Alamrani v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:00 am
In New Hope Family Services v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Volokh v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In Rizzo v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:58 am
In Weiss v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONV. v City of New York [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
In Adamowicz v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:28 am
Here is a recent New York case Shefa Unlimited, Inc., et al. respondents, v Amsterdam & Lewinter, 2006-10191 SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 2008 NY Slip Op 1937; March 4, 2008, Decided, which reports the unsuccessful attempt to add new allegations against a law firm in a "relation back" setting. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Vivendi Universal in 2012 and $253 million in the employment case Velez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Dist. v Benstock, 144 AD3d 758, the Appellate Division said that "The determination of whether a dispute between a public sector employer and [its] employee is arbitrable is subject to [a] two-prong test. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:04 am
Matter of Vivian Gina Giovanna Mihailescu, M.D. v James G. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
