Search for: "Character v. State" Results 5841 - 5860 of 6,688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2012, 3:02 am
Lord Neuberger explained that technical information meant information of a technical nature and, similarly commercial information meant information that was commercial in character, rather than information that may have a value to someone; further, the expression was unlikely to have been intended to cover all ‘confidential information’, as otherwise that would have been explicitly stated (para. 32). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:09 am
[17] Internal Revenue Service, United States Departmente of the Treasury, Limited Liability Company, [www.irs.gov] (last visited Nov. 3, 2007) [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court, in one of its most historical decisions, Marbury v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
This legislative history is narrated in DPP v Collins (para 6), a very interesting decision on s 127, involving a man who made repeated  telephone to his local MP's office asking for him to do something about the "black bastards" - or similar terms. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:12 am by jonathanturley
Barrett sat through days of such baseless attacks on her character and even had to face attacks referencing her children. [read post]
” Maybe You Should Have Hired a Lawyer The Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Nashville decided Ueber v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am by jonathanturley
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:07 pm by Derek Bambauer
Injunctions affecting speech are different in character than injunctions affecting other things, such as conduct, and even the cases that Abrams cites (such as Universal City Studios v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:17 am by SHG
  Sometimes it's good to be a senior judge with life tenure.In United States v. [read post]