Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 10:55 pm
But it does not have a zero tolerance policy for Salmonella, unlike E. coli O157:H7, which is one of the deadliest food borne pathogens. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 3:39 pm
But it does not have a zero tolerance policy for Salmonella, unlike E. coli O157:H7, which is one of the deadliest food borne pathogens. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:50 pm
On appeal, the Federal Circuit agreed with the notion that a clause that merely indicate the purpose of a limitation does not add patentable weight. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:10 pm
§1D-35(2) (listing “[t]he likelihood, at the relevant time, of serious harm” as one of nine factors that “the trier of fact . [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 12:08 pm
Super Duck Tours, LLC, 531 F.3d 1, 35 (1st Cir. 2008) (finding no confusion between BOSTON DUCK TOURS and SUPER DUCK TOURS; “Boston” and “Super” were descriptive, while the marks’ first words were “their most salient features”). [read post]
Attacking References Individually: Obviousness Rejection Upheld by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
14 Feb 2013, 8:57 am
Today, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) upheld an Examiner's 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:44 am
For example, if a “transition” application (1) is filed on or after March 16, 2013 and claims priority to an earlier-filed application, and (2) does not claim any new subject matter, then the transition application will still be governed by the first-to-invent rule. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:18 am
They note that protection does not hinge on the literary merit of the work. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:56 pm
”); see also id. at 948 n.1 (explaining waiver does not apply to verdicts under Rule 49(a), but it does apply to verdicts under Rule 49(b)). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:37 am
§ 343-1(a)(3). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:08 am
” (para. 35) This judgment is somewhat disappointing, as the exclusion of an undertaking operating illegally on a market would not seem to have any effect on competition. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:07 am
MPEP 804(B)(1). [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:02 am
Ok, so what does that mean to you, as a person going through this? [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 8:24 am
§ 102, on „prima facie obviousness‟ under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 5:21 pm
Officials managed to pressure QBE Insurance into cutting force-placed insurance rates by 35 percent. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
A little-remarked feature of the bail decisions in the George Zimmerman case is that bail was increased ten-fold to $1 million after the defendant had lied about the amount in his legal defense fund. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:50 pm
(“Leggett”) of noninfringement of claims 1-5 of U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:35 am
Keep in mind that aside from providing identification, a person does not have to make any statements and has an absolute right to remain silent. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm
I could be wrong about all of this and maybe [their novel PET imaging agent] does provide a definitive diagnosis of CTE (the definition of which may need amending). [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 12:01 pm
According to the survey, about 35 in 100 U.S. adults are “online diagnosers,” and women are more likely to join that club than men. [read post]
