Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 5841 - 5860 of 7,665
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 10:18 am by Mark Toth
Mark There are a total of 50 errors. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:25 am
 The court examined the factors for confusing similarity as stated in In re E.I. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:59 am
Heard you're learning drums too: Quelle suprise! [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Craig R. Hersch
The variables that we use for our formulaic assumptions may or may not be on the mark. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:10 pm by Dan Michaluk
Le Boulon This is a wonderful solution if you’re like me and keep your work clothes at work. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:13 pm by Mike McBride
Trial Director Training If you follow me on Twitter or Facebook, you’re probably... [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 5:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Although certification provides valuable information, at the point of purchase “[i]t is the marks themselves, as representations of quality, upon which consumers rely in purchasing decisions, and the well-established reputations of the entities which authorize them, not the standards upon which the product certifications are based. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Subject matter: he thinks that a sign that is not distinctive or that is generic is not a mark, so we’re not talking about permissible uses of marks but rather about things that are not within the subject matter—that’s his sleight of hand. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Barrett thinks we’re unlikely to see more defenses created by the courts. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:06 am by Gene Quinn
  I’m proud of the content that we have provided at AT! [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:46 am by David Lat
“I’m proud to say that these days I’m known as Seth Davis’s father,” Lanny Davis joked.) [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:30 am
(Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Copyright Litigation Blog) YouTube – Tech groups ask court to preserve DMCA safe harbors: Viacom v Youtube (Public Knowledge) (EFF) (Ars Technica)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit applies California law to domain name ownership dispute and remands for determination of whether ‘innocent purchaser’ defense applies: CRS Recovery, Inc v Laxton (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm by Vado Porro
 I start counting down to the finish as soon as I'm past the halfway mark. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:58 pm by Kashmir Hill & David Lat
He delicately asked if they’re more qualified or if there are a disproportionate number of them applying for clerkships. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 9:59 pm by JD Hull
You don't get to say this much: "Sorry, Jack, but I'm on my break. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:53 pm by Molly DiBianca
  It was worthy of posting here, as well, so that's exactly what I'm doing. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:50 am by Gritsforbreakfast
So mark it on your calendar if you want to attend, and I'd encourage anyyone who cares about this subject to do so. [read post]