Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 5841 - 5860 of 10,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm by Scott Bomboy
The website Politico reported on Wednesday afternoon that a court spokesperson said the media will get notice between 60 minutes and 90 minutes before the findings and orders are announced from the three-judge panel that considered the case of State of Washington v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by azatty
In April 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court, in Varnum v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
  In response, the Constitution’s defenders, chiefly Edmund Randolph and James Madison, insisted that this threat was fanciful and that, in fact, slavery would be more secure inside the Union than outside of it. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:16 pm by Andrew Raff
In granting summary judgment for YouTube in Viacom v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
The main problem with the first step in Mostyn J’s reasoning – even if he is right in law (which he may well be: certainly Sir James Munby, former President of the Family Division considers he is) – is that the Court of Appeal has decided otherwise in Clibbery v Allan, a judgment by which Mostyn J as a first instance judge is bound. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:05 am by Cody M. Poplin
The Compliance with Court Orders Act of 2016 comes in response to the ongoing FBI v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am by Rishabh Bhandari, Jordan Brunner
  Quinta examined whether the Justice Department just admitted doubts over Trump’s oath in its brief on appeal in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
It is the author's contention, moreover, that it is partly due to the "negative synergy" of judicial usurpation of the amendment processes that genuine amendments are far harder to secure today than when James Madison introduced his original list of twelve proposed amendments in 1789, of which ten promptly received sufficient state resolutions of ratifications to become the Bill of Rights of 1791. [read post]