Search for: "JOHNSON v. THE STATE"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 8,030
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
The Guidelines language defining “crime of violence” in §4B1.2(a)(2) is the same language found unconstitutionally vague in Johnson v. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
19 Nov 2009, 12:16 pm
People v Johnson, 1076, 2486/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 6728; 65 A.D.3d 975; 886 N.Y.S.2d 375; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 10:47 am
Orville Grace Brethren Church, 2005-Ohio-4264 ¶ 5 (9th Dist.); State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:38 am
Reed Stephens and Alisha Johnson look at the court’s decision in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
Alabama in holding that race predominated in the drawing of 28 legislative districts in North Carolina, and correctly applied the Supreme Court’s rulings in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:47 am
Johnson, the main one upholding the law, discussed here; Kaminski v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
Title: Jones v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:53 am
Ed. 2d 591 (1992); Johnson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:33 am
Wheat, State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:26 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, June 20, 2008 Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:18 am
In Gantler v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am
Although opponents of disparate impact focus on Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:03 pm
’” The Court further noted that the Massachusetts ACCA was essentially similar to the Federal ACCA, whose residual clause had recently been struck down, in Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:03 pm
’” The Court further noted that the Massachusetts ACCA was essentially similar to the Federal ACCA, whose residual clause had recently been struck down, in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm
I accept the submission, made by Mr Johnson, that advantage in some other respect, does not remedy indirect discrimination. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:24 am
This is why Omar is at once so important and so wrong: Prior cases (see, e.g., Johnson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
Rodriguez, Johnson v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm
Raich (21:07), in which the Court affirmed that the “Supremacy Clause unambiguously provides that if there is any conflict between federal and state law, federal law shall prevail”; and McIntyre v. [read post]
