Search for: "People v High"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 15,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:06 am
No, a pound for your breach of confidence: no richesse for Richmond is a case comment on the decision of the Chancery Division of the High Court in Richmond Pharmacology Ltd v Chester Overseas Ltd, Milton Levine and Larry Levine (here). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:18 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Young v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Key US Supreme Court decisions, such as Jones v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
The High Court denied the petition to appeal. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:13 am
Art. 27 of DSA is recommender system transparency; are they high-risk AI systems w/in the meaning of the AI Act? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm
Bush v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
I have come to the conclusions that civility is almost always essential in public discourse, that finding common ground with folks you disagree with makes for better, more high minded discussions and debates, and that it is quite difficult to achieve civility and common ground on social media, which is a major problem inside and outside of legal education.Professor Sander is the leading proponent of the so-called "mismatch theory" that was the basis for Justice Scalia's… [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
The Act thus cannot be justified by Bishop v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:52 am
People think that I was. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:36 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 7:31 pm
So, the stakes can be high. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Polarization moves in cycles, and this nation experienced a cycle when a period of high polarization began at the end of the 19th century, with a sharp rise in inequality during the Gilded Age. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
MARBURY V. [read post]
