Search for: "State v. Downes"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 36,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am
If Kennedy doesn't want to commit himself to holding that the Constitution requires same-sex marriage everywhere in the United States, he may not be a fifth vote to strike down DOMA.The elephant in the room, of course, is the Perry v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
Supreme Court struck down Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act— and the laws of 15 other states that still prohibited marriage between white people and people of other “races” — as unconstitutional and “obviously an endorsement of the doctrine of White Supremacy. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 11:11 am
In Texas Workforce Commission v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
v=IIGyVa5Xftw#t=49 At the heart of the takedown decision is a fight over fair use in copyrights when mixed with commercial speech. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:11 am
Preemption Under CAN-SPAM Trancos also argued that Balsam’s state law claims were preempted by CAN-SPAM. [read post]
15 May 2023, 8:15 pm
As I noted in that post, Judge O'Connor is the same judge who wrote a truly awful decision in the last major Obamacare case (in which a group of red states tried to bring down the entire ACA by claiming that it couldn't be severed from the now-unconstitutional individual health insurance mandate). [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
The case is C-524/04 Test Claimants in the Thin Cap Group Litigation v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
The most important election law case before the United States Supreme Court this term is Gill v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Alleyne v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 5:43 am
In Future Motion, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
These will be handed down in Court 2 from 9.45am. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
This is the lowest level of support since 1972, the year the Supreme Court voided all existing state death penalty laws in Furman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 2:21 pm
It is for the member States to establish a system of legal remedies to ensure that individual rights under EC law can be enforced (Case C-50/00 P Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:45 am
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine; he notes that “several conservative justices have expressed an interest in reviving nondelegation principles,” which “could be used to strike down all manner of economic regulations. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
The US Supreme Court handed down its decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Dear Readers:Just recently, the Eleventh Circuit largely overturned the District Court’s decision in US and State of Florida ex re Ruckh v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:42 am
After all, didn’t Epic Games v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:15 am
United States v. [read post]
