Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 5841 - 5860 of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 2:53 pm
If question 4 is answered in the affirmative, what facts or circumstances are then required in order to be able to accept that there is a real connecting link, as referred to in paragraph 40 of the Van Uden v Deco-Line judgment [Case C-391/95], between the subject-matter of the measures sought and the territorial jurisdiction of the Contracting State of the court before which those measures are sought? [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
  In Shelby County v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm by justinsilverman
There is not a lot of precedent in this area (but see one of our favorites, Online Policy Group v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm by Venkat
He has also posted extensively on a recent Ninth Circuit decision that bears on these issues: United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Reporters without Borders and the National Union of Journalists have contacted by policy holders. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 10:14 am by Lyle Denniston
The holders of the defaulted Argentine bonds were represented in the case by Washington lawyer Theodore B. [read post]