Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 5841 - 5860 of 57,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
That view cannot, so it seems to me, survive the opening words of FPR 27.11, which expressly state that the right granted to journalists is to attend a hearing held in private. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Officials from both countries said that the new deal would boost business ties. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”In addition, Thomas argued that allowing federal courts to overturn a state prisoner’s conviction and sentence was an “intru[sion] on state sovereignty … [that] overrides the State’s sovereign power to enforce societal norms through criminal law. [read post]
30 May 2022, 5:14 pm by Tom Smith
Last month in Public Discourse, Josh Craddock “called the question”: if Roe v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:17 am by John Floyd
  In 2012, the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 majority landmark decision (one hotly contested by Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia) in Martinez v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 5:00 am by Joy
Legislature clerk found guilty of breach of trust, fraud US Federal judge strikes down sign law requiring transgender bathroom warningsTaliban orders all female TV presenters to cover their faces while on airItalian coffee shop fined $1,050 for failing to display price of espressoNYC Judges’ retreat apparently became superspreader event; karaoke said to be one of the activitiesTamara Lich to find out Wednesday if she's returning to jailTrump has paid his $110,000 fine for… [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
The Chancellor stated that only because the font is chipped, it may be removed and destroyed. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:27 pm by privacylawyer
In his view, this is best achieved through the established test in R v Collins, [1987] 1 SCR 265, 308. [read post]
28 May 2022, 7:51 am by Eric Segall
 In related news, when this issue became public, Justice Thomas did not deny the problem and simply said that he “inadvertently omitted [his wife's income] due to a misunderstanding of the filing instructions. [read post]