Search for: "T. Roberts" Results 5841 - 5860 of 36,592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 1:31 pm
Justice Roberts made it perfectly clear that on the [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
After the Chief's unitarian decision in Seila Law, I don't think he'll find that the House's subpoena is enforceable. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 1:23 pm by Philip R. Stein
“[T]he CFPB director’s removal protection is severable from the other statutory provisions bearing on the CFPB’s authority. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:55 am by Ilya Somin
I think Roberts has the better of this debate, but I will not try to cover it in detail here. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:12 am by Timothy B. Lee
Under police questioning, Williams pointed out that the grainy surveillance footage obtained by police didn't actually look like him. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:01 am by Howard Friedman
  Chief Justice Roberts majority opinion, joined by Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, said in part:This case also turns expressly on religious status and not religious use. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm by Josh Blackman
The Chief didn't swing to the left; at most, he feinted left for this Blue June. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Casey opinion, in shorthand, adopted the “undue burden” test.Casey put to rest (for a while) the question whether a more conservative Supreme Court would overrule Roe—the conservatives had the potential votes, but it didn’t happen. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Jareb Gleckel
Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion, despite rejecting balancing, does not ignore benefits altogether. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 5:07 pm by Tom Smith
Roberts, in a separate concurring opinion, broke the tie in the liberals’ favor. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 3:03 pm by Matthew Guariglia
This bill would be a critical step to ensuring that mass surveillance systems don’t use your face to track, identify, or incriminate you. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Howard Friedman
[T]he idea that a regulated party can invoke the right of a third party for the purpose of attacking legislation enacted to protect the third party is stunning. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:40 am by Tom Smith
The court didn't say that Trump couldn't reverse the program, but that his legal reasoning wasn't up to par.But it was Roberts's vote on this Monday morning that convinced conservatives he will never be on their side, and regret that President George W. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:46 am by Jonathan Bailey
The judge didn’t stop at tossing the lawsuit and has hit Lee herself with a $1 million judgment for filing the frivolous case. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Marcia Coyle
But even if he were, that doesn’t mean his majority opinion wasn't based on law. [read post]