Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 8,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2012, 6:06 pm
The Civil Service Reform Act (“CLRA”) establishes a comprehensive framework for reviewing adverse personnel actions taken against Federal employees: first, the case goes before the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) for hearing, and the employee may then seek appellate review at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:02 pm
United States, No. 11-597 (filed Ju... [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
Breaking News: Husbands and Wives of Nation’s Constitutional Law Professors Collectively File for Divorce Posted on June 25, 2012 RENO, NEVADA (Press International), June 25, 2012: The husbands and wives of the nation’s estimated 543 married Constitutional Law professors collectively filed for divorce today in Nevada state court, alleging that their spouses’ complete obsession with the United States Supreme Court’s… [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm
The Appeals Court issued a brief order indicating, "Petitioners, the State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Industrial Energy Consumers, and the Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company, seek a stay pending review of that portion of the Environmental Protection Agency's final rule requiring the reduction of sulfur dioxide emissions at four electric generating units. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:33 am
Louisiana and Graham.Maria Pulzetti, EDPA, Capital Habeas Unit [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:01 am
United States, No. 11-1353 (cert. petition filed May 8, 2012). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
” Brief for United States 21. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
United States (No. 11-9307) (case page forthcoming), in which it will consider how to treat an error that becomes plain during the appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
United States (No. 11-9307) (case page forthcoming), in which it will consider how to treat an error that becomes plain during the appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
As with the others, the FCC petitioners are mostly concerned about having to reveal online their spot-by-spot ad rates, but with this difference: The petitioners propose to aggregate such data in a way that would not reveal their ad rates but would actually make it easier for everyone, journalists included, to understand who is contributing to whom, and in what amounts, and in addition to include online the same kind of information for state and local candidates, something… [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
United States, 2011 U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:53 pm
United States, 536 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 10:29 am
In this regard, the words of the United States Supreme Court in the case of In re Little (1972), 404 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 7:13 am
United States, http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-94a1b2.pdf Petitioner Southern Union Company was convicted of violating a statute that criminalized storing liquid mercury without a permit, punishable by fines of up to $50,000 per day of violation. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:55 am
By: Michael Thompson The United States Supreme Court has ruled that pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) are “outside salesmen” who are not entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:33 am
By: Michael Thompson The United States Supreme Court has ruled that pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) are “outside salesmen” who are not entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:33 am
By: Michael Thompson The United States Supreme Court has ruled that pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) are “outside salesmen” who are not entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
On Petitions for Review of a Final Rule of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm
In this Petition for review of two orders of the United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Appeal Court ruled by Summary Order which does not have precedential effect. [read post]
