Search for: "Administrative Hearing Office" Results 5861 - 5880 of 19,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 4:16 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Through 22 offices in the United States, Mexico, and Singapore, the AAA provides a forum for the hearing of disputes, rules and procedures and a roster of impartial experts to resolve cases. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:12 am
Court sustains Human Rights’ finding that the reasons advanced by employer for terminating employee was pretext for unlawful discriminationNew York State Office of Mental Health v New York State Division of Human Rights, 2010 NY Slip Op 06268, Decided on July 29, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentBisi Asimolowo was employed by the Office of Mental Health as a pharmacy intern in 1992 and Asimolowo understood that he was expected to take and pass the licensing… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:11 am by Nahal Zamani, Human Rights Program
and affiliate offices across the country) has worked to ensure that the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 6:12 am by Mike Underwood
If the case is not settled, it goes to a hearing before an NLRB administrative law judge and the judge may issue a decision extending Weingarten rights to non-union workers. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 6:12 am by Mike Underwood
If the case is not settled, it goes to a hearing before an NLRB administrative law judge and the judge may issue a decision extending Weingarten rights to non-union workers. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:11 am
"The court noted that the record included a letter addressed to the Hearing Officer on school district letterhead that was "jointly" submitted by the parties indicating that the school board had designated the hearing officer at its meeting on December 4, 2006.Although the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Wiggins v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 385, said that "[i]n the absence of a written delegation authorizing a deputy or other… [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:01 am
”The court noted that the record included a letter addressed to the Hearing Officer on school district letterhead that was “jointly” submitted by the parties indicating that the school board had designated the hearing officer at its meeting on December 4, 2006.Although the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Wiggins v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 385, said that "[i]n the absence of a written delegation authorizing a deputy or… [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:00 pm by Hannah Roskey
It was much busier, with more staff and different office procedures in place. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jay Butchko
Our office serves clients throughout Maryland from offices in Glen Burnie, Owings Mills, Ellicott City, and Annapolis. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge to the liability protections granted to social media companies under the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 11:29 am by Dan Pinnington
Administrative dismissal claims are almost universally preventable. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 10:56 am by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
The plaintiff appealed the hearing officer’s decision to the superior court, which ruled that that his decision had been arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:55 am
The penalty recommended by the hearing officer: Feinberg should be terminated from his employment. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 10:49 am
The penalty recommended by the hearing officer: Feinberg should be terminated from his employment. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:53 am
McGhee, it was a bit of a shock to read Neal Katyal, the attorney representing the Obama Administration, tell the court that if a prosecutor knows a police officer fabricated evidence and puts it on at trial, there is not a Fifth Amendment due process violation (p. 20) !! [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
In July, the House select committee on the Jan. 6 attack started its work with a headline-grabbing hearing, featuring testimony from law enforcement officers present at the Capitol during the attempted insurrection. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
This is not to say that the Constitution can prevent a resolutely partisan majority of the House of Representatives from impeaching either a cabinet officer or a president simply because it doesn’t like administration policy. [read post]