Search for: "Birth v. Birth" Results 5861 - 5880 of 7,219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 am by John L. Welch
TTAB veteran Jack Clifford recently posed a new version of the "unclean hands" affirmative defense in Kellogg North America Company v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:33 pm by Schachtman
  Haack focuses upon Dr Robert Brent, a toxicologist, who seems to pop into her mind as Merrell Dow’s expert witness “always ready to testify that Bendectin does not cause birth defects. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:53 am
  Though this time, it's not a creatively-spelled obscenity.It's a run-of-the-mill immigration case, holding that a person who tried to cross the border illegally by pretending to be a U.S. citizen (by using someone else's birth certificate) isn't eligible for cancellation of removal. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Rick
  Riches were abundantly available to the resourceful irrespective of birth. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am by Legal Beagle
SCOTTISH POLICE have now lost the ability to question suspects without their solicitor being present, after the UK’s Supreme Court in London finally issued its ruling today on the Appeal case of Cadder (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland), throwing out the practice in Scotland of being able to question suspects without a solicitor in attendance as being a violation of Human Rights laws.The background to the case : The Appellant was detained by the police… [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:34 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: As several scholars have noted, the Supreme Court’s Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:02 am
His application was initially rejected by the Commission because of Fiffe’s date of birth but it was subsequently accepted and processed. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:39 am
Most animals, however, will be tagged, but, even among these, some will lose their tags somewhere between the birthing pen and the slaughter house floor. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm by Matthew Hill
In R (Gurung) v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWHC 1496 (Admin), the grounds of review were irrationality and age discrimination. [read post]