Search for: "Does 1 through 12"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 15,572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
§ 718.111(12)(g)2.j. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
This is especially true if the patient does not receive a copy of their dental record. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:45 am
., of going forward, then shifts to the trademark holder to rebut the prima facie showing with evidence of either: (1) use of the mark during the statutory period; or (2) an intent to resume use. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
In Australia the Assistance and Access Bill passed through Parliament on 6 December 2018 has raised issues around cybersecurity and misuse. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 2:18 pm
For example, the legislation implementing TPP-11 (or the CPTPP) includes a new Division 1 GB to the Act being sections 153ZKT to 153ZKZB. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 8:52 am
’” Id.at *1. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 4:58 pm
7, 2019, at A1, col. 1. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 4:58 pm
7, 2019, at A1, col. 1. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:18 pm
Patrick Kroker explained indeed that 4 cases had been filed since 2017 (a relatively high rate) thanks to the amount of evidence already readily available through structural investigations. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
” 12 C.F.R. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:18 pm
§ 156(e)(1). [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:18 am
For example, FDA does not address how it will define technologies that are more than 10 years old, which may be difficult because technologies often evolve gradually through multiple iterations. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:54 am
The author offers a refreshing perspective on this question by pursuing a methodological approach that does not apologize for not using economics. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 7:23 pm
1, 2018. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
And while the Commissioners found that 1-800 Contacts had two legitimate, plausible justifications for entering into the settlement agreements – the avoidance of litigation costs through settlement and trademark protection – the Commissioners ultimately reasoned that these justifications were not valid in the face of a showing that competition would likely be harmed by the settlement agreements. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:31 pm
And, while the Commissioners found that 1-800 Contacts had two legitimate, plausible justifications for entering into the settlement agreements—the avoidance of litigation costs through settlement and trademark protection—the Commissioners ultimately reasoned that these justifications were not valid in the face of a showing that competition would likely be harmed by the settlement agreements. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:31 pm
And, while the Commissioners found that 1-800 Contacts had two legitimate, plausible justifications for entering into the settlement agreements—the avoidance of litigation costs through settlement and trademark protection—the Commissioners ultimately reasoned that these justifications were not valid in the face of a showing that competition would likely be harmed by the settlement agreements. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
” RCW 9A.52.025(1). [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
Under probation, a defendant does not serve prison time, but is instead released. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 6:43 am
This designation does not apply to local businesses. [read post]
