Search for: "I v. B"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 24,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
I am continually troubled with disconnects between the text of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:57 am
Kaplan and Philip B. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:48 pm
I wont hold my breath [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:56 am
That day has come.The second amicus brief is in Intellectual Ventures v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:56 am
The children and I are staying here in the United States because I have found a job and will provide them with the necessary care i [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
§ 1123(b)(6). [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:40 am
Oracle Google v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Does Article 22(1)(b) operate to prevent a claimant’s entitlement to the care component of DLA being defeated by a residence requirement imposed by national legislation on a transfer of residence to another member state? [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
KSR v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:40 am
Retirement System is required by law to correct errors in retirement benefit payments and seek repayment of excess benefits already paid to a retireeMatter of Palandra v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 2010 NY Slip Op 50735(U), Decided on March 17, 2010, Supreme Court Albany County, Judge George B. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:41 am
Steneken v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Code § 16051(b) & Health & Safety Code § 34179.5(b)(3); numerous California regulations, including 10 CCR § 2590.1(d); and the CalPERS’ Board of Administration Gift Policy. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am
The materials sought related to the investigation of two complaints filed with the Office of the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District (SCI) concerning whether a speech that was given by an employee of the New York State Department of Education (DOE) at a public high school and later reproduced on DOE's website violated Chancellor's Regulations D-130(I)(B)(2), (I)(B)(8), and (I)(C)(1). [read post]
LEGAL UPDATE ON FLORIDA CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CONVICTIONS AND THEIR IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES-PART TWO
24 Jun 2015, 6:30 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mellouli v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 8:35 am
I'm at a loss to remember the last one -- it might be Meiselman v. [read post]
