Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
I, § 8 of the Constitution empowers Congress to "promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:48 pm
Well, I’m not so sure. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
” Down below I have attached my written remarks. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
This issue gets bigger by the minute, but Congress is loathe to wrap it into the larger health reform debate, because doing so would kick the health reform package over the magic $1 trillion mark. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:39 am
I'm actually poking fun at nineteenth century America. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:07 pm
“With ongoing support from the President and Congress as well as the efforts of our hardworking employees, I am confident the hearings backlog will continue to diminish. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:49 am
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy established a forensic-science subcommittee, and legislation will be introduced in Congress next month to bolster research and oversight of crime labs. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
At the ACS Blog, Mark Tushnet predicts that the Court will rule in the petitioners’ favor – an outcome that, he opines, casts doubt on the consistency of Republican deference to federalism in other policy areas. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:38 am
If you've had any interest in the intersection of accounting standards and Congress (the location commonly referred to as "hell," I believe), be sure to read Jon Weil's Bloomberg piece on last year's Congressional hearing that led FASB to issue watered-down financial instrument impairment rules. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm
"I'm not going to talk about it. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:33 am
Menasche, 348 U.S. 528, 538-39 (1955) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:06 am
As I blogged yesterday, I believe one necessary first step is enhancing the usability of communications to shareholders. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
Menasche, 348 U.S. 528, 538-39 (1955) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:48 pm
On February 26, 2010 (Friday), I will be speaking as part of the Stanford Technology Law Review annual Symposium. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:24 pm
I believe we need to set in stone through legislation enough time for Congress to consider a comprehensive energy bill. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 am
In addition, a forward-looking statement need not be included in a section marked “Forward-Looking Statements” or specifically labeled as a “forward-looking statement” to be “identified as a forward-looking statement” under the safe harbor. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
David Lat weighs in on the piece at Above the Law, while Paul Horwitz writes at PrawfsBlawg that “[a]lthough it’s enjoyable, I think it’s mistaken in some important ways. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:45 am
" If I read Klein correctly, there should not be an Obama Agenda, that it is for the Congress to have an agenda. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:18 am
” [18] As Congress returns its attention to financial reform, I urge it to do so with investors and the American public foremost in mind. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:41 am
I wholeheartedly agree. [read post]
