Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 19,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
” Wyoming v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am
An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:08 am
And the 6th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:11 am
In Williams v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 10:01 pm
Colvin recounted that: ‘All ride long they swore at me and ridiculed me. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am
Conceptually non-material damages are not limited to emotional and psychological harm (see, inter alia, recital 75 GDPR) and any negative consequence (see also para. 50 of the ECJ judgment) may be compensated, as long as the damage is proven. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
But here the interpretation in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:06 pm
Printz v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 1:41 am
Supreme Court did in Schware v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 8:20 am
Long: Product similarity: She didn't specifically measure that, but subjectively her sense is that people were much more likely to sue when the products were in similar or closely related markets. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:18 am
S. 266 (2000), and Alabama v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:09 am
In SONY v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 11:40 am
In the case at hand, State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Power VenturesBlizzard v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in another case this year, Buck v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
One is Ingersoll v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court made clear in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Power VenturesBlizzard v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:56 am
Biowatch Trust v Registrar Genetic Resources and Others (CCT 80/08) [2009] ZACC 14 – read judgment Costs again, I am afraid, and how to make sure that ordinary people can litigate important cases without being stifled by a huge costs bill if they lose. [read post]
