Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 9,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
District court: You're probably wrong, so no preliminary injunction for you. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 4:06 pm
That Petition is before the Court in Florida House of Representatives, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 8:59 am
The Federal Circuit also found that the district court might have the power to award fees based upon its inherent judicial power. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
DOJ has not filed a mandamus motion.DOJ has not lobbied Congress to modify the judicial divisions in Texas, or any other state. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
" A recent criminal case from Westchester County, People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am
The post Wednesday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:12 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:54 pm
Federal district court complaint filed July 14, 2023. [read post]
26 May 2009, 4:46 pm
She also noted that it was nine white men on the Court who decided Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:44 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:00 pm
Copyright Royalty Board12-928Issue: (1) Whether the court failed to cure the violation of the Appointments Clause because, despite the judicial revision of 17 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:19 am
& Cundy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 1:36 pm
If the Supreme Court were to declare these laws unconstitutional under the first and fourth amendments, would it be accurate to say that this judicial declaration was an assault on democracy? [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am
The case was remanded to the district court. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 2:50 pm
Our lawsuit, Wikimedia v. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 6:00 pm
v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:27 am
Supreme Court placed a moratorium on executions in its 1972 Furman v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
Joh v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
After exhaustive analysis, the Court concluded that the courts in question were actually Article III courts with the judicial protections befitting that label. [read post]
