Search for: "State v. House" Results 5861 - 5880 of 28,800
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2020, 12:01 am by Tessa Shepperson
  We start with an important legal case Trecarrel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm by Schachtman
In the United States, the President awards the National Medal of Freedom. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:48 am by Giles Peaker
  Trecarrell House Limited v Rouncefield (2020) EWCA Civ 760 It is fair to say this Court of Appeal decision has been widely and keenly awaited. [read post]
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 913; Weinberg v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman
It primarily seeks an injunction against the planned June 23 publication of Bolton’s book, “The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir,” and a “constructive trust” that would give the United States the right to all of Bolton’s profits from the book. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 7:00 pm by Stuart Benjamin
On June 8 John Eisenberg from the White House sent Bolton a letter saying that the book still contained classified information. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Simply stated, if the Mandiant report was not created in anticipation of litigation, then per Judge Anderson, it is not subject to the work-product doctrine protection. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:09 am by Michelle O'Neil
The United States Supreme Court has moved a giant leap forward in LGBTQ+ rights with the latest opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On the role of bigotry claims in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:02 am by Giles Peaker
Mitchell, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Islington (2020) EWHC 1478 (Admin) Where a local authority has an initial s.188 Housing Act 1996 duty to provide interim accommodation, but then makes a s.184 decision that the applicant is not in priority need, is that sufficient to bring the s.188 duty to an end? [read post]