Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
United States] we see no ground for reaching a different conclusion here. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:57 am
§ 22B-2; state statute must yield to the FAA under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution). [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:58 pm
Remember how I said Lawfare would return tomorrow, to cover further proceedings in the commission case of United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
• Kara Brockmeyer, head of the FCPA Unit in the Division of Enforcement, stated that the unit is off to a fast start in 2014. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Smith, Staff Counsel at Americans United for Life (Counsel of Record for Drury Development Corporation et al. in Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
It appears that Merck KGaA (MK) alleged that MSD had infringed its trade mark in the United Kingdom and, while it's not stated explicitly in the note received by this Kat, it looks as though there had been use of the mark but that MSD was arguing that it was a use that was permitted under the terms of the agreement, since MSD was arguing here that the agreement was governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am
Like he would be in the later Plessy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
There is also respected literature from the United States situating a lawyer’s ethical duties within that lawyer’s religious community and tradition. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Hargis had argued that this evidence would be too prejudicial.On January 13, 2014, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General "to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States." [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
” Records on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) show that on August 5, 2013, Tesla Motors, Inc. filed a trademark application for “Model E,” in several classes of goods, including that for “Automobiles and structural parts therefor. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
It explained that The conspiracy statute under which the jury convicted Leitner criminalizes conspiracies to either: (1) commit any offense against the United States; or (2) defraud the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:20 am
In MidAtlantic International Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
. ____ Q: What is the name of the wood pavement patentee in City of Elizabeth v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 11:13 am
s non-organic mushrooms into the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
In addition, [Van Praagh] claims [Gratton] has used the Van Praagh Trademark while offering her spiritual medium services at various venues throughout the United States and on her websites, Facebook Page, Twitter account and YouTube channel. . . . [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:12 pm
The great majority of investment is made in the United States (36%) and Australia (31%). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
